How can we explain the causes of the crisis: Financial system failure? Greed? Lack of productive locations for investment?
It’s a combination of factors. Firstly there was a large element of greed and people taking on far too much risk. A symptom of the inflated expectations the markets have for the profitability of companies. This causes them to have to “bet the farm” just to meet expectations.
The other main factor is the inter-connectedness of the work economy which means that a failure in one part can bring down the whole system. Combined with the incredible complicity of the world financial markets you find that few people really understand how it works, consequently the risk of debt instruments was not really understood by the traders buying them.
· To what extent is the crisis a product of lack of innovation?
Ironically the problem may actually be down to innovation. The Credit Default Swaps were an innovative product but one that was not clearly thought out.
Innovation is one the buzz words that most angers me. The dictionary definition of innovation is use of a new idea or method. Just because something is new doesn’t mean it is a good idea. CDSs were a new idea and a very bad one as well.
· Where and how is value created today?
Value is created in solving customers’ real needs profitably. A lot of what has been sold and what is now being left on the shelves were products that were not adding real value to peoples lives by solving their problems. As such it was easy for consumers to stop purchasing these.
The other way value is created is through continuous improvement which has in manufacturing lead to impressive reliability. We now need to apply the same approaches that have worked so well in manufacturing to the knowledge economy.
· What role can government play in facilitating innovation and value creation (or getting out of the way)?
They must support education and lifelong learning by removing all tax on training courses and training materials. I have paid for a post graduate course and am still tax on that and taxed on ebooks I buy because they are considered software. Education should be encouraged and the governments policy of taxing education will reduce the number of people training in the skills the country needs for its future.
· Does fundamental research need to be championed?
The introduction of the transistor lead to the IT industry which is a major driver of the world economy so if the research lucks out then it can bring huge benefits. I would champion research but not at the expensive of more beneficial areas such as championing continuous improvement.
· Where do ordinary people’s interests fit into debates about the future?
People should have the right to fulfil their needs which according to Maslow have 5 levels. What we do in the future should be done with this in mind. We should not bring in anything which will harm the ability of people to fulfil their needs.
· Is the crisis a basis for taking on more ambitious challenges?
No it isn’t. Lets sort out the basic challenges before we move onto ambitious. Set SMART objectives and meet them rather than Big Hairy Goals that cannot be realised.
· Are networked tools a key to dealing with the recession?
Not in the current form which although good for general networking and discussion are not sufficient for collaborative working which will be vital in creating new products that will thrive in the recessionary times.
· What are the contemporary barriers to innovation?
There are too many to list but the most important factor would be the lack of risk taking and ability to take calculated risks.
· Is there untapped potential in the design and creative industries
Only if they can combine their innate creativity with critical thinking. We must learn to do both right and left brain thinking. People may use too much left brain thinking but that is not done well. Critical thinking skills need to be learnt to use the fully potential of the left brain.
March 5, 2009 at 10:32 am |
[...] Mark Stringer of Agile Lab noted that “with the credit crunch, there is a real danger that clinging to old old stories can prevent us from making any real sense of new data that we need new models and new stories to understand” (Agile Lab: Innovation and the Credit Crunch: tell me a new, new story) Rob Killick, CEO of cScape, argues that “governments should lead. A big problem with our government is that it is often not prepared to take bold action, for example in pushing ahead the nuclear power station building programme, because it is afraid to face down the opposition” (UK After The Recession: Innovation island?). (See also his white paper The UK After The Recession [PDF].) Tobi Schneidler of Maoworks argues for “whole new era of enlightenment that connects the global financial, industrial and environmental challenges into one forward looking vision, sparking a wave of innovation not seen since World War II” (Maoworks Department of Information The blue ocean has dried up. Who will do the refill?). Kevin McCullagh notes that in design world has celebrated superficiality, but “the bring-on-the-slump crowd are equally self-indulgent”. He believes that their “sense of shame is not based on a clear analysis of the benefits people gain from stuff relative to overblown problems like landfill. The self-doubt instead stems from the intellectually paralysing effect of sustainability ideas”. (Design and the depression, Kevin McCullagh, Blueprint, April 2009) Mark Nicholson of Interactive Investor (writing in a personal capacity) argues that the crisis “may actually be down to innovation” [our italics] in the financial sector. “Value is created in solving customers’ real needs profitably [and] through continuous improvement” he notes. “We now need to apply the same approaches that have worked so well in manufacturing to the knowledge economy.” He argues that government “must support education and lifelong learning”, and he advocates fundamental research “but not at the expensive of more beneficial areas such as championing continuous improvement”. On people’s needs he notes that “[w]e should not bring in anything which will harm the ability of people to fulfil their needs”. He believes we should take on “basic challenges before we move onto ambitious”. On the network he argues that our tools “are not sufficient for collaborative working which will be vital in creating new products that will thrive in the recessionary times”. And he believes creative industries need to “combine their innate creativity with critical thinking”. (technology @ iii.co.uk: Beyond the Crisis: Debating the role of innovation. Also at Dwell Upon: Response to Beyond the Crisis: Debating the role of innovation) [...]